Birdman Review

Run time: 119 mins       Certificate: 15
Director: Alejandro G. Iñárritu
Cast: Michael Keaton, Edward Norton, Emma Stone.
Release Date: January 1, 2015.


Keaton Returns

Birdman hooks you in from the beginning. A meditating Michael Keaton levitates above the ground as the ominous voice of Birdman reflects on his failures. From this moment onwards you’ll be glued to the screen, caught inside Riggan’s (Keaton) struggle between launching his own Broadway show and maintaining both his family and his own sanity. All whilst his past blockbuster role of the superhero Birdman entices him back to the easy pay check and global fame it once gave him. Its an excellent character study that grabs hold and never lets go until the end, an unrelenting ride through Riggan’s personal life and inner psyche. Exceptional performances and cerebrally tuned direction lend this surreal trip a numbing sense of reality; in other words you’ve never seen anything quite like Birdman.

The whole affair is best watched in one go without interruption, and even if you’re bursting for an intermission you’ll likely endeavour to stay seated to the end. Emmanuel Lubezki presents the entire film as a singular absorbing experience where the camera weaves naturally towards the next scene without a cut as if the entire film were one long take. One particular take that see’s Keaton awkwardly stride half naked through crowded streets is a definite highlight. Tricks are naturally employed to give this effect between scenes, but even having each individual scene progress with minimal cutting emphasises the ‘day in the life of’ perspective put forth here even with the focus on time and characters shifting throughout. The result lends a tangible intimacy that comes with every shot, a backstage argument proving just as involved as a defining speech on stage before an audience.

Keaton and Stone as the dysfunctional father and daughter duo.
Keaton and Stone as the dysfunctional father and daughter duo.

Likewise Antonio Sanchez’s minimal soundtrack bolsters this seamless approach, slow burning drum solos between scenes building the momentum before fading out as a characters dialogue carries its rhythm onwards. Every moment devotes itself to exploring these flawed characters and you’re right there with them; a long shot of silence that stares down an empty hall for 20 seconds or so will have you holding your breath for what dramatic beat will storm into that empty space next. Its at this moment that you’ll realise Birdman doesn’t only deserve your attention, but demands it.

It may sound like an awfully serious affair, but Birdman greatest appeal lies in just how funny it can be. Keaton and Norton’s chemistry on screen leads to some hilarious confrontations, their tenuous relationship that flips from admiration to rivalry entertaining all the more because of its sincerity. Likewise the arguments between Riggan and his Birdman persona, complete with a growling superhero voice, are moments so darkly funny because of the genuine chords they strike away at.

Iñárritu’s direction leaves no stone unturned. Superhero blockbusters are disassembled to their base components, both ridiculed and praised for being what they are. An enraged Keaton onslaughts Lindsay Duncan’s reviewer for misusing her position when at the same time he unknowingly evaluates his self same issues. Its in its raw exploration of these aspects of show business that the comedy is found; without an agenda Birdman simply presents these standpoints for what they are, knowingly laughing at itself just as much as it does its targets. The ending above all encapsulates what Birdman analyses, the desire to be talked about, and once the credits begin to roll you’ll most certainly talk about it.

Norton's Mike is the perfect foil for Riggan.
Norton’s Mike is the perfect foil for Riggan.

Keaton is at the top of his game as Riggan, dominating the screen with his gratifyingly delivered rants and proving depressively fragile when confiding in co-stars Emma Stone and Amy Ryan. A film such as this could easily come off as aloof, especially with a lead like Riggan, but its Keaton’s unfettered magnetism that keeps the sentiments behind the madhouse genuine. There is another star of this show in Edward Norton however, playing a role seemingly written for him effortlessly. His smug stage actor drives much of the backstage tension whilst remaining comically charming; a perfect opposite for Keatons weathered star. Emma Stone mirrors her father’s solitude well as the recovering addict, playing a well worn role with enough substance as to never be in danger of becoming a cliché.

Smaller roles all have their moments as well. The aforementioned Lindsay Duncan’s subdued bitterness plays off of Keaton and Norton perfectly in her few scenes. Zach Galifianakis and Amy Ryan are brilliant anchors in Riggan’s life, again leaving a lasting impression without the need for lengthy appearances. Andrea Riseborough and Naomi Watts are cast well, their respective romantic sub plots rounding out the circus that is the backstage drama in what limited time their given. With a prolific cast that play off of each other so flawlessly the one issue with Birdman is all the more glaring, as its disappointing to see that the majority of their threads are left hanging come the conclusion of Riggan’s.


Verdict

An altogether original descent into one man’s endeavour to do something with his life, Birdman is as every bit euphoric as it is darkly telling. Keaton turns in the performance of a lifetime, both mentally and physically, while a supporting cast headed by an on form Norton ice the cake and then some. All this wrapped in a hypnotic long take style and intertwining drum solos synonymous with the beats of the characters it plays in. A rare example of the medium that is as much an experience as it is a film, its time you sat down and found out what it means to be Birdman.

Hits

+Keaton’s Birdman is sublime
+Norton heads up a fantastic supporting cast
+Iñárritu’s subtle dissection of the film industry
+Lubezki’s long take cinematography is like nothing else
+Laughs are as organic as the rest of the experience

Misses

Character threads are left hanging

Overall Rating

5starsCritical Hit

Into the Woods Review

Run time: 125 mins       Certificate: PG
Director: Rob Marshall
Cast: Meryl Streep, Emily Blunt, James Corden.
Release Date: January 9, 2015.


Happily Ever After?

Into the Woods opens strongly, simultaneously throwing together a menagerie of fairy tales whilst placing its own knowing spin on them, all in the space of its brilliant opening number. It continues on in this fashion, criss crossing between the likes of its original bakers and well known characters such as Red Riding Hood and Cinderella whilst maintaining an effortless sense of cohesion. Knowing winks and parodies will keep adults entertained (the likes of Chris Pine’s Prince Charming in particular) while the spectacle of seeing these childhood favourites sing circles around each other is sure to enthrall children, though all ages are sure to take delight in the final result. Its a shame then that it falters in the delivery of its more ambitious second act, its restraint from getting ‘too dark’ shrouding its moral messages in vagueness when they could have been far more poignant.

As a musical Into the Woods mostly impresses. While memorable songs such as the opening Prologue may be a little on the sparse side, James Lapine does deserve praise for using the songs to tell the story rather than rely on dialogue to pad out the silence between a bombardment of big show stoppers. Yet despite capturing the flow of a story book, Rob Marshall doesn’t forget its stage origins. Most scenes take place on a single set as if being filmed on an ever changing stage, with grand effects being used liberally and the spotlight firmly placed on the woods and colourful characters.

into the woods 3
Tales new and old come together in novel ways.

Despite the first act being set up and balanced well, its when its ambitions to be more than just a fairy tale are dialed up that things begin to derail. The fantastical is grounded as issues such as death and infidelity are thrown into this land of princesses and giants. This dark departure clashes well with the yarn that has been told up to this point but is never seen all the way through. Arguing for more clarity may seem odd given the films message of ambiguity, in that no situation can ever be reduced to what is good and evil, but in its effort to appeal to all ages the delivery inevitably becomes all too vague. The important questions are posed, but the answers (and actions) rarely offer any satisfying answers. If the final act were a conversation between a parent and a child about these issues the child would undoubtedly pose the question of “Why?” throughout. Into the Woods may spare the audience these interruptions but in turn provides a less justified account of events.

Meryl Streep poised to steal another scene as the Witch.
Meryl Streep poised to steal another scene as the Witch.

Meryl Streeps Witch is the star of the show, relishing every devilish line of her telling numbers (“You’re not good, you’re not bad, you’re just nice.”) whilst remaining disturbingly skittish in conversation. Chris Pine clearly has a ball as the Prince, his and Bill Magnussen’s rendition of ‘Agony’ being one of the aforementioned tongue in cheek stand outs. Lilla Crawford and Daniel Huttlestone also impress as Little Red Riding Hood and Jack, the energy behind their performances granting them just as much a presence on screen as the likes of Depp and Streep. James Corden is perhaps the only weak link; though he manages to keep his intentionally mundane part of The Baker believable against the star studded cast he never quite convinces us of his characters plight and subtler virtues. However when alongside a compelling Emily Blunt the two make a sympathetic couple, and his narration provides the warm but apprehensive tone perfect for the audiences journey into the woods.


Verdict

Into the Woods almost nails its fantastic concept. Across the board, from cameos to big players, the cast exude energy and fully devote themselves to the fantasy. But for a stage play as original as this, the songs are rarely memorable despite their telling the tale well. Its second act struggles between telling hard truths whilst maintaining a family appeal, the two approaches never coming together as well as they could have. It might not end on a high, but the energy and originality behind this musical are sure to entertain.

Hits

+The cast, particularly Streep, impress across the board.
+Keeps a great sense of theatricality despite the high end effects and sets.
+Every musical number tells the story well…

Misses

…But few stand out from the rest.
Difficult second act struggles to sell its unconventional message.

Overall Rating

3starsHit